CROSS-STANDARD public interest · LED luminaire
China-to-Pakistan LED Luminaire Compliance Gap Matrix
AI-compiled from official public sources — cross-checked by multiple AI models, not human-verified. Informational only; see disclaimer. Public-interest, source-linked comparison of common China LED luminaire documentation (GB / GB/T standards, CCC certification) against Pakistan requirements: PSQCA mandatory conformity assessment and marking for lamps, PS/IEC adopted standards (PS/IEC 60598, 62560, 62471), NEECA energy efficiency labelling, and PTA type approval for wireless/smart luminaires. Pakistan voltage is 230 V, 50 Hz.
Dataset 2026-06-11
Last verified 2026-06-15
11 rows
GAP MATRIX
Compliance Gap Matrix
| Compliance item | Common China baseline | Pakistan (PSQCA) | Gap / action | Source + verification date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Efficiency — NEECA Labelling (no EU-style minimum-efficacy gate) | China's equivalent is GB 30255-2019 (Energy efficiency requirements for LED room luminaires), defining three grades: Grade 1 ≥90 lm/W, Grade 2 ≥80 lm/W, Grade 3 ≥70 lm/W, with Grade 3 the minimum for market entry. The China Energy Label (CEL) registration is mandatory for GB 30255-covered products, administered by SAMR (with CQC/CECP). GB 30255 combines a binding minimum-efficacy gate (Grade 3) with a mandatory efficiency-grade label — a stricter binding floor than a pure labelling scheme.GB 30255-2019 — Energy efficiency requirements for LED room luminaires (SAC/SAMR) China Energy Label (CEL) scheme — administered by SAMR/CQC/CECP |
Pakistan's energy-efficiency framework for appliances and lighting is led by NEECA (National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority), which operates a minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) and energy-labelling programme. Where LED lighting products are brought within NEECA's covered-product scope, the importer/manufacturer must meet the applicable NEECA energy-efficiency requirement and display the NEECA star-rating energy label. Crucially, Pakistan does NOT operate an EU-Ecodesign-style binding minimum-efficacy regulation (EU Reg 2019/2020) that gates market access on lm/W, CRI, lifetime and power-factor thresholds across the board; NEECA's instrument is primarily a labelling/star-rating scheme (with MEPS where set per product category) rather than a comprehensive Ecodesign performance gate. Coverage of specific LED lamp/luminaire categories under NEECA has been phasing in — confirm the current NEECA covered-product list and label format for the specific product before shipment.NEECA Act 2016 — National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority mandate (MEPS and energy labelling for covered products) NEECA energy-labelling / star-rating programme — applicable where the LED lighting category is within NEECA covered-product scope |
This is a structural difference. The EU-to-China lane contrasts the EU Ecodesign binding minimum-efficacy gate against China's GB 30255 grades; the China-to-Pakistan lane is different again — Pakistan does NOT have an EU-style comprehensive Ecodesign performance gate, and its energy instrument (NEECA) is primarily MEPS-plus-labelling where the product category is covered. Practical points for a Chinese exporter: (1) China already applies a binding efficacy floor (GB 30255 Grade 3, ≥70 lm/W) plus CEL labelling, so a CN-compliant product typically already meets a reasonable efficacy level — but the CN CEL label and NEECA star-rating label are different schemes and not mutually recognised; (2) where the LED category is within NEECA scope, the importer must register/qualify for and display the NEECA energy label, which is a separate step from CN CEL; (3) confirm the current NEECA covered-product list, because LED coverage and label thresholds have been phasing in and may differ from / not yet cover certain luminaire types. Do NOT assume the EU Ecodesign lm/W / CRI / lifetime / power-factor gate applies in Pakistan.[INFORMATIONAL] Pakistan's energy-efficiency requirement for LED lighting is driven by NEECA (MEPS-plus-labelling where the category is covered), NOT an EU-style comprehensive Ecodesign minimum-efficacy gate. A Chinese product already meeting GB 30255 (Grade 3 floor ≥70 lm/W) plus the CN Energy Label typically has a reasonable efficacy baseline, but the CN CEL and the NEECA star-rating label are separate, non-mutual schemes — where the LED category is within NEECA scope, the NEECA label is an additional step handled via the importer. Do not assume EU lm/W / CRI / lifetime / power-factor thresholds apply; confirm the current NEECA covered-product list and label format. | National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (NEECA), Pakistan2026-06-15 · reference |
| Energy Label Display & Registration — NEECA label vs EU EPREL/A-G label | China's China Energy Label (CEL) under GB 30255-2019 is mandatory for covered LED room luminaires; products must be registered with CQC/CECP before affixing the CEL, which shows Grade 1–3 based on absolute lm/W thresholds. The CEL is a grade-based label registered through a CN scheme. There is no mutual recognition between the CN CEL registration and Pakistan's NEECA labelling programme.GB 30255-2019 — Energy efficiency requirements for LED room luminaires (SAC/SAMR) China Energy Label (CEL) scheme — administered by SAMR/CQC/CECP |
Where an LED lighting product is within NEECA's covered-product scope, Pakistan requires display of the NEECA energy-efficiency label (a star-rating-style label) on the product/packaging, and registration/qualification of the model with NEECA as part of the labelling programme. Pakistan does NOT operate an EU-style EPREL public product database, and the NEECA label is a star-rating format rather than the EU rescaled A–G class derived from an Energy Efficiency Index (EEI). There is no EU-style legal requirement to display an A–G energy label on online product listings for the Pakistan market. The NEECA label content, star thresholds and registration mechanics are set by NEECA per covered product category — confirm the current format, thresholds and registration process for the specific LED category before shipment.NEECA energy-labelling / star-rating programme — label display and model registration for covered products NEECA Act 2016 — National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority mandate |
Both China (CEL) and Pakistan (NEECA) operate a mandatory energy label for covered products, but the schemes differ and are not mutually recognised: (1) the CN CEL is a Grade 1–3 label registered via CQC/CECP, while the NEECA label is a star-rating format registered with NEECA where the LED category is covered — a CN-registered product must separately qualify and display the NEECA label; (2) Pakistan has no EPREL-style public product database, so there is no EPREL registration step and no EU-style online-listing label-display duty; (3) the NEECA star thresholds use a different scale from CN grades and are not directly cross-mappable. Practical action for the exporter: where the product is within NEECA scope, work through the Pakistan-resident importer to register/qualify the model and apply the correct NEECA label artwork; confirm the current covered-product list, star thresholds and label format, as LED coverage under NEECA has been phasing in.[INFORMATIONAL] Where an LED product is within NEECA's covered-product scope, Pakistan requires display of the NEECA star-rating energy label and model registration with NEECA. There is no EU-style EPREL public database and no online-listing A–G label duty. The CN China Energy Label (Grade 1–3, via CQC/CECP) and the NEECA star-rating label are separate, non-mutual schemes on different scales. Work through the Pakistan-resident importer to qualify the model and apply the correct NEECA label, and confirm the current covered-product list, thresholds and format, as LED coverage has been phasing in. | National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (NEECA), Pakistan2026-06-15 · reference |
| EMC Emissions — PS/IEC CISPR 15 (Lighting Equipment Radio Disturbance) | China's equivalent is GB 17743-2017 (Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of electrical lighting and similar equipment), technically aligned with CISPR 15. For in-scope luminaires sold in China, GB 17743 compliance is part of CCC certification (which covers both safety and EMC for relevant categories), tested at CNAS/CMA-accredited laboratories. Chinese CCC EMC test reports are issued for the China market and are not automatically recognised by PSQCA.GB 17743-2017 — Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of electrical lighting and similar equipment (SAC/SAMR, aligned with CISPR 15) | Pakistan does not operate a single horizontal EMC directive equivalent to the EU EMC Directive. Lighting-equipment radio-disturbance (emissions) requirements are addressed through Pakistan Standards adopting the IEC/CISPR base — typically PS/IEC CISPR 15 (limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of electrical lighting and similar equipment), covering conducted emissions on mains terminals (150 kHz–30 MHz) and radiated emissions. Where EMC characteristics form part of the PSQCA conformity assessment for an in-scope lamp/luminaire, compliance evidence to the adopted CISPR 15 limits is expected. For luminaires with embedded radio (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth), radio-emissions and spectrum aspects are handled separately by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) type-approval regime — see ledpk-emc-02. Products operate on a 230 V, 50 Hz supply.PS/IEC CISPR 15 — Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance characteristics of electrical lighting and similar equipment (Pakistan Standard adopting CISPR 15, administered by PSQCA) PSQCA Act 1996 — conformity assessment for items on the PSQCA Conformity Assessment list |
Both Pakistan (PS/IEC CISPR 15) and China (GB 17743) derive from CISPR 15, so emission limits are largely harmonized and an existing CISPR-15-based test report is technically reusable in substance. The gaps are recognition and structural: (1) Pakistan has no single horizontal EMC directive — EMC is addressed within PSQCA conformity assessment where applicable rather than as a stand-alone CE-style EMC DoC, so confirm whether EMC evidence is required for the specific lamp/luminaire on the current PSQCA list; (2) Chinese CCC/GB EMC reports are not automatically accepted by PSQCA — reports may need to be issued or aligned to the PS/IEC CISPR 15 edition through the conformity process; (3) for smart luminaires, radio emissions are handled by PTA, not by the general lighting-EMC route (see ledpk-emc-02). The substantive limits gap is small; the main effort is documentation/recognition through PSQCA and the importer.[INFORMATIONAL] Pakistan has no EU-style horizontal EMC directive; lighting radio-disturbance (emissions) is addressed through PS/IEC CISPR 15 within PSQCA conformity assessment where the product is in scope. Limits are broadly harmonized with China's GB 17743 (both CISPR 15-derived), so a CISPR-15-based report is technically reusable, but Chinese CCC/GB reports are not automatically recognised by PSQCA. Smart luminaires with embedded radio are handled separately by PTA. Confirm EMC evidence requirements for the specific item against the current PSQCA list via the importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| Wireless / Smart Luminaire Radio Approval — PTA Type Approval | For wireless-enabled luminaires (e.g., smart LED with Wi-Fi/Bluetooth) sold in China, SRRC (State Radio Regulation Commission / State Radio Monitoring Center) type approval is required, covering the radio module's frequency, power and spurious-emission compliance. SRRC type approval is the China-domestic radio authorisation and is not recognised by PTA — a separate PTA type approval is required for the Pakistan market.SRRC type approval — required for wireless-enabled devices/luminaires in China (State Radio Regulation Commission) | Luminaires with embedded radio functionality (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee smart lighting) require type approval from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) before they can be legally imported, sold, or operated in Pakistan. PTA Type Approval covers the radio module's operating frequency band, power, and conformity to the technical standards PTA recognises (commonly ETSI/IEC-based radio test reports). This is separate from, and additional to, PSQCA electrical-safety conformity. The 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz licence-exempt bands used by Wi-Fi/Bluetooth are regulated by PTA's frequency allocation framework; the importer typically applies for PTA type approval per device model. Smart-luminaire EMC/immunity for the embedded radio is demonstrated through the radio test reports submitted to PTA.Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organisation) Act 1996 — PTA mandate for telecom/radio equipment type approval PTA Type Approval / Technical Standards Regulations — type approval for radio-frequency devices (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Zigbee modules) |
Both Pakistan (PTA) and China (SRRC) require a national radio type approval for wireless functionality, but the two authorisations are mutually non-recognised — an SRRC certificate does not satisfy PTA, and a separate PTA type approval must be obtained for each smart-luminaire model entering Pakistan. Practical gaps: (1) the importer/manufacturer must file a PTA type-approval application with radio test reports (often ETSI/IEC-based) for the embedded module; (2) frequency-band and transmit-power allocations recognised by PTA must be confirmed for the 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz bands used; (3) lead time and importer involvement are required — a smart luminaire cannot be legally cleared without PTA approval. Non-wireless LED luminaires do not require PTA type approval (only the PSQCA/safety route applies).[INFORMATIONAL] Smart/wireless LED luminaires require PTA type approval before import, sale or operation in Pakistan — this is separate from and additional to PSQCA electrical-safety conformity. China's SRRC type approval is the domestic equivalent but is not recognised by PTA, so a separate PTA approval is required per model. Non-wireless luminaires fall outside PTA scope and need only the PSQCA/safety route. Arrange PTA type approval through the Pakistan-resident importer with the embedded module's radio test reports. | Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| Photobiological Safety — Blue Light Hazard (PS/IEC 62471 Risk Groups) | China has adopted GB/T 20145-2006 (Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems), technically equivalent to IEC 62471:2006. GB/T 20145 is a recommended standard (T = tuijian, recommended) and is not universally mandatory for all LED luminaires in the Chinese market; enforcement for residential luminaires is not uniformly prescribed. The standard is used to derive the same RG0–RG3 risk groups.GB/T 20145-2006 — Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems (SAC/SAMR — recommended standard, equivalent to IEC 62471:2006) | Photobiological safety of LED lamps and luminaires in Pakistan is assessed against PS/IEC 62471 — the Pakistan Standard adopting IEC 62471 (Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems), used to derive the photobiological risk group from blue-light-weighted radiance and irradiance. Risk groups range from RG0 (Exempt) to RG3 (High risk). Pakistan does not operate an EU-Ecodesign-style standalone regulation that independently mandates a photobiological risk-group declaration on the energy label; rather, where PSQCA conformity assessment covers the lamp/luminaire, photobiological safety to the adopted PS/IEC 62471 may be expected as part of the technical evidence. RG2/RG3 products would carry usage restrictions and warnings. Confirm whether PS/IEC 62471 evidence is required for the specific product on the current PSQCA Conformity Assessment list.PS/IEC 62471 — Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems (Pakistan Standard adopting IEC 62471, administered by PSQCA) | Pakistan (PS/IEC 62471) and China (GB/T 20145) both derive from IEC 62471, so the risk-group methodology is shared and a test report deriving RG0–RG3 is substantively reusable. The gaps are recognition and scope: (1) China's GB/T 20145 is recommended-only and may not have been tested for a given residential product, so a Chinese manufacturer may not already hold a photobiological report; (2) Pakistan does not impose an EU-style standalone blue-light-class label obligation (see ledpk-photobio-02) — photobiological evidence is relevant where PSQCA conformity assessment requires it rather than as a universal labelling mandate; (3) Chinese reports are not automatically recognised by PSQCA and may need alignment to the PS/IEC 62471 edition through the conformity process. Where required, document a defensible risk-group classification to PS/IEC 62471 and include RG2/RG3 warnings. Confirm the requirement against the current PSQCA list via the importer.[INFORMATIONAL] Photobiological safety in Pakistan is assessed against PS/IEC 62471 (PSQCA adoption of IEC 62471), relevant where the lamp/luminaire is within PSQCA conformity-assessment scope. The IEC base is shared with China's recommended GB/T 20145, so a risk-group report is substantively reusable, but Chinese reports are not automatically recognised and a CN manufacturer may not already hold one. Pakistan has no EU-style standalone blue-light-class labelling mandate. Document an RG0–RG3 classification to PS/IEC 62471 where required and confirm the requirement against the current PSQCA list. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| No Blue Light Hazard Class Label Mandate in Pakistan (vs EU Energy-Label class) | China's mandatory China Energy Label (CEL) under GB 30255 (LED room luminaire energy efficiency) likewise does not include a blue-light-hazard class — the CN label focuses on energy-efficiency grades and lumen output. Neither China nor Pakistan operates a consumer-facing blue-light-class labelling mandate equivalent to the EU energy label, so on this specific point the China and Pakistan positions are similar (both lack the EU obligation).GB 30255-2019 — Energy efficiency requirements for LED room luminaires (SAC/SAMR — no blue-light-class requirement) | Pakistan does NOT impose an EU-style mandatory blue-light-hazard class on the product energy label. There is no Pakistan regulation equivalent to EU Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2015 Annex VI that requires a plain-language blue-light class (RG0 'No risk' / RG1 'Low risk' / RG2 'Moderate risk') to be displayed on lamp packaging or online listings. Photobiological safety, where relevant, is handled as technical evidence under PS/IEC 62471 within PSQCA conformity assessment (see ledpk-photobio-01), not as a consumer-facing label class. Any blue-light or photobiological warning on Pakistan-market packaging would generally arise only from RG2/RG3 product warnings or from voluntary/importer requirements, not from a horizontal labelling regulation.No Pakistan equivalent to EU Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2015 Annex VI blue-light-class labelling — photobiological evidence handled under PS/IEC 62471 within PSQCA conformity assessment where applicable | Unlike the China-to-EU lane, there is no added consumer-facing blue-light-class labelling step for the China-to-Pakistan lane — Pakistan has no horizontal regulation requiring it, and China's label likewise omits it, so there is no incremental labelling gap on this specific point. The only photobiological obligation that may arise is the technical risk-group evidence under PS/IEC 62471 within PSQCA conformity assessment (covered in ledpk-photobio-01), plus standard RG2/RG3 product warnings where applicable. Exporters should not assume the EU blue-light label is required for Pakistan; they should instead confirm whether photobiological test evidence is needed for the specific product on the current PSQCA list, and follow any importer-specified packaging/warning conventions (English/Urdu).[INFORMATIONAL] Pakistan has no EU-style mandatory blue-light-hazard class on the product label, and China's energy label likewise omits it — so unlike the China-to-EU lane there is no incremental consumer-facing blue-light labelling step for Pakistan. The only photobiological obligation that may arise is PS/IEC 62471 risk-group evidence within PSQCA conformity assessment (see ledpk-photobio-01), with RG2/RG3 warnings where applicable. Do not assume the EU blue-light label is required for Pakistan; confirm photobiological-evidence requirements against the current PSQCA list via the importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| No Horizontal RoHS Substance-Restriction Regime in Pakistan | China operates GB/T 26572-2011 (Requirements for concentration limits for certain restricted substances in electrical and electronic products), covering the original six RoHS substances (Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE) at the same concentration thresholds as EU RoHS, together with China RoHS 2 (SJ/T 11364-2014) which mandates a hazardous-substance disclosure label (orange / green logo) on EEE sold in China. As of 2026, the four EU phthalates (DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP) are not yet in China's mandatory restricted list under GB/T 26572. China's regime is therefore primarily a disclosure-labelling scheme rather than an outright market-access restriction.GB/T 26572-2011 — Requirements for concentration limits for certain restricted substances in EEE (SAC/SAMR — covers the original 6 substances) SJ/T 11364-2014 — Marking for the restricted use of hazardous substances in electronic and electrical products (China RoHS 2 disclosure label) |
Pakistan does NOT operate an EU-style horizontal RoHS substance-restriction regime for electrical and electronic equipment. There is no Pakistan law equivalent to EU Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) restricting lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, PBB, PBDE and the four phthalates (DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP) in homogeneous materials as a market-access condition for LED luminaires. PSQCA conformity assessment for lamps/luminaires focuses on electrical safety and performance to the adopted PS/IEC standards (see ledpk-safety-01/02), not on a horizontal hazardous-substance restriction. Consequently, there is no mandatory RoHS Declaration of Conformity, no maximum-concentration-value testing, and no RoHS-style marking required for the Pakistan market itself. Note: individual buyers, multinational brands, or specific tender specifications may contractually require RoHS-equivalent compliance, but that is a private/commercial requirement, not Pakistani law. Importers should confirm whether any product-specific chemical-safety or labelling rule applies for the particular item.No Pakistan horizontal RoHS regime — no national equivalent to EU Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) / Directive (EU) 2015/863 restricting substances in EEE as a market-access condition PSQCA Act 1996 — conformity assessment is safety/performance-based for items on the PSQCA Conformity Assessment list, not a hazardous-substance restriction |
Unlike the China-to-EU lane, there is no incremental RoHS substance-restriction gap to close for the Pakistan market — Pakistan has no horizontal RoHS regime, so Chinese manufacturers do not need to test for the four EU phthalates or produce a RoHS DoC for Pakistan market access. The relevant substances obligation on the China side remains the existing China RoHS 2 disclosure label (SJ/T 11364) and the six-substance limits (GB/T 26572), which the manufacturer already applies for the China market. Practical points: (1) do not assume EU RoHS testing is required for Pakistan — it is not a legal market-access condition there; (2) where a Pakistani buyer, multinational brand, or tender contractually demands RoHS-equivalent compliance, treat it as a commercial specification and provide the relevant substance test evidence accordingly; (3) the China RoHS disclosure label is a China-market marking and is neither required nor recognised by PSQCA for Pakistan placement.[INFORMATIONAL] Pakistan has no EU-style horizontal RoHS substance-restriction regime, so there is no legal requirement to test for restricted substances or the four EU phthalates, and no RoHS DoC or RoHS marking, for Pakistan market access. The applicable substances obligation remains China's own RoHS 2 disclosure label (SJ/T 11364) and GB/T 26572 limits, which are China-market measures. RoHS-equivalent compliance for Pakistan would only arise as a private buyer/brand/tender requirement — confirm any such commercial specification with the importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| No REACH-Style SVHC Supply-Chain Notification Duty in Pakistan | China likewise has no direct equivalent to the REACH SVHC Article 33 articles-level supply-chain notification obligation. The closest Chinese instruments are the Measures for the Environmental Management of New Chemical Substances (MEE Order No. 12, 2020) on new chemical substance registration, and GB 30981-2020 (rules for the classification and labelling of chemicals) for hazardous chemicals. None of these create a duty to proactively notify B2B customers or consumers when an SVHC is present in an article above 0.1% w/w. On this specific point, China and Pakistan are similar — neither imposes a REACH Article 33-style articles obligation.MEE Order No. 12 (2020) — Measures for the Environmental Management of New Chemical Substances (China) GB 30981-2020 — Rules for the classification and labelling of chemicals (China) |
Pakistan does NOT operate a REACH-style chemical regime, and there is no Pakistani obligation equivalent to REACH Article 33 (duty to communicate information on Substances of Very High Concern in articles above 0.1% w/w), no ECHA-style Candidate List that must be tracked biannually, and no SCIP-style database registration for articles placed on the Pakistan market. For LED luminaires, there is therefore no ongoing supply-chain SVHC notification duty as a condition of selling in Pakistan. Chemical/hazardous-material handling in Pakistan is governed by general environmental and import frameworks and the in-country importer's obligations rather than by an articles-level SVHC communication regime. As with RoHS, a private buyer, multinational brand, or specific tender may contractually require SVHC/REACH-style declarations, but this is commercial, not a Pakistani legal market-access duty.No Pakistan REACH-style regime — no national equivalent to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Article 33 SVHC supply-chain notification, no ECHA Candidate List tracking duty, and no SCIP-style database registration for articles | Unlike the China-to-EU lane, there is no REACH SVHC notification gap to close for the Pakistan market — Pakistan imposes no Article 33-style supply-chain communication duty, no biannual ECHA Candidate List screening, and no SCIP-style registration. Neither China nor Pakistan operates an articles-level SVHC notification regime, so on this point there is no incremental obligation versus what a Chinese manufacturer already does domestically. Practical points: (1) do not build a REACH SVHC screening process specifically for Pakistan market access — it is not legally required there; (2) where a Pakistani buyer, multinational brand, or tender contractually requests SVHC/REACH-style declarations, treat it as a commercial specification and supply the requested substance declarations; (3) general chemical/import handling still flows through the in-country importer and applicable Pakistani environmental/import rules, which should be confirmed for the specific consignment.[INFORMATIONAL] Pakistan has no REACH-style SVHC supply-chain notification regime, so there is no Article 33 communication duty, no biannual ECHA Candidate List screening, and no SCIP-style registration for Pakistan market access. China likewise has no articles-level SVHC obligation, so there is no incremental duty versus existing CN practice. Any SVHC/REACH-style declaration for Pakistan would arise only as a private buyer/brand/tender requirement — confirm any such commercial specification with the importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| Conformity & Marking Process — PSQCA Conformity Assessment vs CCC / CQC | In China, the primary mandatory certification for in-scope luminaires is CCC (China Compulsory Certification), administered by CNCA and requiring third-party certification by a CNCA-authorized body (e.g., CQC — China Quality Certification Centre); voluntary CQC certification is available for products outside the mandatory CCC scope. For wireless-enabled luminaires, SRRC type approval is additionally required in China. CCC and CQC are China-domestic schemes — the certificates and the GB-standard test reports behind them are not automatically recognised by PSQCA for the Pakistan market.CNCA-C10-01 — CCC certification rules for luminaires (CNCA/CQC) SRRC type approval — required for wireless-enabled luminaires in China |
Market access for LED lamps/luminaires in Pakistan generally runs through PSQCA (Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority) rather than a self-declared CE-style route or an EU-style multi-directive technical file. Where the lamp/luminaire is on the PSQCA mandatory Conformity Assessment list, the importer/manufacturer must obtain PSQCA conformity assessment and apply the PSQCA conformity/quality mark, supported by test evidence against the adopted PS/IEC standards (PS/IEC 60598, PS/IEC 62560, PS/IEC 61347-2-13, and CISPR 15 / 62471 where applicable). A Pakistan-resident importer is generally required to lodge the application and handle customs clearance at Karachi / Port Qasim. Smart luminaires additionally require PTA type approval (see ledpk-emc-02). There is no horizontal RoHS or REACH obligation bundled into this process (see ledpk-rohs-01/02); the technical file is safety/performance-centric.PSQCA Act 1996 — conformity assessment and mandatory conformity/quality marking for items on the PSQCA Conformity Assessment list PS/IEC 60598 / PS/IEC 62560 / PS/IEC 61347-2-13 — adopted safety standards underpinning PSQCA conformity assessment for lamps and luminaires |
Both Pakistan (PSQCA conformity assessment + PS mark) and China (CCC + CQC) operate third-party conformity/marking schemes, but they are mutually non-recognised — a CCC certificate and its GB test reports do not satisfy PSQCA, and a separate PSQCA conformity assessment is required for items on Pakistan's mandatory list. Key practical gaps: (1) a Pakistan-resident importer is generally needed to lodge the PSQCA application and clear customs at Karachi / Port Qasim, whereas CCC is handled by the China-side manufacturer/agent; (2) test evidence must align to the PS/IEC editions accepted by PSQCA, and the 230 V / 50 Hz rating must be reflected (vs China 220 V); (3) the PSQCA process is safety/performance-centric and does NOT bundle a horizontal RoHS or REACH obligation, unlike the EU CE+RoHS bundle; (4) smart luminaires need a separate PTA type approval. Plan for importer involvement, PS/IEC-aligned test reports, and 230 V marking; confirm the specific product's mandatory-list status with PSQCA via the importer.[INFORMATIONAL] Market access for LED lamps/luminaires in Pakistan runs through PSQCA conformity assessment and the PS conformity/quality mark for items on the mandatory Conformity Assessment list, generally lodged via a Pakistan-resident importer with PS/IEC-aligned test evidence and 230 V / 50 Hz rating. Chinese CCC/CQC certification and GB reports are not automatically recognised, and the two schemes are parallel and non-mutual. Unlike the EU CE bundle, the PSQCA process is safety/performance-centric and does not bundle a horizontal RoHS or REACH obligation; smart luminaires additionally need PTA type approval. Confirm the specific product's mandatory-list status with the importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| Electrical Safety — General Luminaire (PSQCA / PS/IEC 60598) at 230 V 50 Hz | China's current general luminaire safety standard is GB/T 7000.1-2023 (Luminaires — Part 1: General requirements and tests), replacing GB 7000.1-2015 from 1 January 2026; both share the IEC 60598-1 technical base. For luminaires within scope, CCC (China Compulsory Certification) is the mandatory third-party route, administered by CNCA and tested at CNCA-authorized laboratories (e.g., CQC). Chinese products are designed for the China grid: 220 V, 50 Hz single phase / 380 V three phase. CCC certificates and GB-standard test reports are issued for the China market and are not automatically recognised by PSQCA.GB/T 7000.1-2023 — Luminaires — Part 1: General requirements and tests (replaces GB 7000.1-2015 from 1 January 2026) CNCA-C10-01 — CCC certification rules for luminaires (CNCA/CQC) |
LED luminaires sold in Pakistan are expected to meet electrical-safety requirements based on the IEC 60598 series, which the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) adopts as Pakistan Standards (PS) — typically referenced as PS/IEC 60598-1 (general requirements and tests) plus the relevant Part 2 for the luminaire type. Where lamps and luminaires fall under PSQCA's mandatory Conformity Assessment list, the importer/manufacturer must obtain PSQCA conformity assessment and apply the PSQCA conformity/quality marking before the product is placed on the Pakistan market. Key safety aspects mirror the IEC base: protection against electric shock (creepage and clearance, insulation, touch current), thermal endurance, and mechanical strength. The product must be rated for the Pakistan grid: 230 V, 50 Hz single phase.PS/IEC 60598-1 — Luminaires — Part 1: General requirements and tests (Pakistan Standard adopting IEC 60598-1, administered by PSQCA) PSQCA Act 1996 — Conformity assessment and mandatory marking for items on the PSQCA Conformity Assessment list |
Both Pakistan (via PS/IEC 60598) and China (via GB/T 7000.1) build on the same IEC 60598-1 base, so the core safety test content is largely harmonized. The practical gaps are conformity-assessment and voltage gaps: (1) Pakistan uses PSQCA conformity assessment and the PS conformity/quality mark for items on its mandatory list — CCC and GB test reports are not automatically accepted, and conformity is typically handled through a Pakistan-resident importer; (2) the nominal supply voltage differs — Pakistan is 230 V, China is 220 V (both 50 Hz), so products must be rated and marked for 230 V operation and verified for thermal/insulation performance at the higher nominal voltage; (3) marking, instructions and warnings should be presented appropriately for the Pakistan market (English/Urdu as required by the importer). Re-testing or report alignment to the PS/IEC 60598 edition accepted by PSQCA is advisable; confirm whether the specific luminaire type is on the current PSQCA mandatory Conformity Assessment list.[INFORMATIONAL] LED luminaire electrical safety in Pakistan is assessed against PS/IEC 60598 (PSQCA-adopted from IEC 60598), with PSQCA conformity assessment and PS marking required where the product is on the mandatory Conformity Assessment list. The IEC base is shared with China's GB/T 7000.1, so test content is largely harmonized, but Chinese CCC/GB reports are not automatically recognised by PSQCA and conformity is usually arranged through a Pakistan-resident importer. Note the 230 V (vs China 220 V) nominal voltage — products must be rated and marked accordingly. Confirm the current PSQCA list status for the specific luminaire type. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
| Self-Ballasted LED Lamp + LED Driver Safety (PS/IEC 62560 / PS/IEC 61347-2-13) | China's equivalent for self-ballasted LED lamps is GB 24906-2010 / GB 24819-2009 (safety specifications for self-ballasted LED lamps), and for LED drivers GB 19510.14-2014 (control gear for lamps — particular requirements for DC or AC supplied electronic controlgear for LED modules), both aligned with the IEC base (IEC 62560 / IEC 61347-2-13). CCC certification may be required for self-ballasted LED lamps and for drivers in certain power ranges sold in the Chinese residential market. Chinese CCC reports are issued for the China market and are not automatically accepted by PSQCA.GB 24906-2010 — Self-ballasted LED lamps for general lighting services > 50 V — Safety requirements (SAC/SAMR) GB 19510.14-2014 — Control gear for lamps — Part 2-13: Particular requirements for DC or AC supplied electronic controlgear for LED modules (SAC/SAMR) |
Self-ballasted LED lamps for general lighting (the common screw/bayonet retrofit bulbs) sold in Pakistan are assessed against PS/IEC 62560 (PSQCA-adopted from IEC 62560 — safety specifications for self-ballasted LED lamps for >50 V). Separate LED drivers / control gear are assessed against PS/IEC 61347-2-13 (adopting IEC 61347-2-13 — particular requirements for DC or AC supplied electronic controlgear for LED modules). Where these lamp categories appear on the PSQCA mandatory Conformity Assessment list, PSQCA conformity assessment and the PS conformity/quality mark are required before market placement. Products must be rated for 230 V, 50 Hz; isolation class, dielectric strength, thermal endurance and marking requirements follow the adopted IEC content.PS/IEC 62560 — Self-ballasted LED lamps for general lighting services by voltage >50 V — Safety specifications (Pakistan Standard adopting IEC 62560, administered by PSQCA) PS/IEC 61347-2-13 — Lamp controlgear — Part 2-13: Particular requirements for DC or AC supplied electronic controlgear for LED modules (Pakistan Standard adopting IEC 61347-2-13) |
PS/IEC 62560 and PS/IEC 61347-2-13 share the same IEC technical base as China's GB 24906 and GB 19510.14, so the underlying safety test content is largely harmonized. The gaps are conformity-assessment, voltage, and marking: (1) Pakistan requires PSQCA conformity assessment and the PS mark for in-scope lamps/drivers — CCC and GB reports are not automatically accepted; (2) products must be rated for 230 V (vs China 220 V) at 50 Hz, with thermal and dielectric performance verified at the higher nominal voltage; (3) if the LED driver is sold as a standalone product it is assessed in its own right against PS/IEC 61347-2-13 — confirm whether the specific driver power/voltage range is on the PSQCA mandatory list; (4) conformity is generally arranged via a Pakistan-resident importer. Re-test or align reports to the PS/IEC editions accepted by PSQCA and verify the current mandatory-list status before shipment.[INFORMATIONAL] Self-ballasted LED lamps and standalone LED drivers in Pakistan are assessed against PS/IEC 62560 and PS/IEC 61347-2-13 (PSQCA adoptions of the IEC standards), with PSQCA conformity assessment and PS marking required where the product is on the mandatory Conformity Assessment list. The IEC base is shared with China's GB 24906 / GB 19510.14, so test content is largely harmonized, but Chinese CCC/GB reports are not automatically recognised. Products must be rated and marked for 230 V / 50 Hz, and a standalone driver is assessed in its own right. Confirm the current PSQCA list status and arrange conformity via a Pakistan-resident importer. | Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)2026-06-15 · reference |
E-E-A-T
Named editorial review
Pending named reviewer
Official regulator, standards body, notified body, customs, or primary legal source preferred. Local PDFs are not accepted.
Editorial controlsRows must include publisher, official URL, access date, verification flag, and last_verified before human_reviewed can be true.
SOURCES
Official-source register.
- National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (NEECA), Pakistan · accessed 2026-06-15 · reference · used in 2 rows
- Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) · accessed 2026-06-15 · reference · used in 8 rows
- Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) · accessed 2026-06-15 · reference · used in 1 rows