CROSS-STANDARD public interest · Lithium battery / power bank

Lithium Battery / Power Bank: China Export to US — Compliance Requirements (UL, DOT, FCC)

AI-compiled from official public sources — cross-checked by multiple AI models, not human-verified. Informational only; see disclaimer. Regulatory comparison of lithium battery and power bank compliance requirements for export from China to the United States. Covers NRTL safety listing (UL 1642, UL 2054, UL 2056), DOT/PHMSA transport rules (49 CFR 173.185, UN 38.3), FCC authorization for wireless products, CPSC market access requirements, and state/local rules including NYC Local Law 39 and California.

Dataset 2026-06-11 Last verified 2026-06-12 5 rows

GAP MATRIX

Compliance Gap Matrix

Gap matrix
Compliance item Common China baseline United States (UL / DOT / UN38.3) Gap / action Source + verification date
Cell / Pack Safety Listing — UL 1642, UL 2054, UL 2056 (NRTL) China's domestic equivalents include: GB 31241-2022 (Safety requirements for lithium-ion cells and batteries used in portable electronic equipment — revised 2022, mandatory for the domestic market under CCC or CQC), GB 18287-2017 (General specification for lithium-ion battery for cellular phones), and IEC 62133-2:2017 adopted as GB/T 36972-2018 for secondary lithium cells. CCC certification under GB 31241 is mandatory for consumer lithium battery products sold in China. These certifications are not recognised as equivalent to NRTL listing under UL standards for the US market.GB 31241-2022 — Safety requirements for lithium-ion cells and batteries used in portable electronic equipment (mandatory CCC/CQC)
GB 18287-2017 — General specification for lithium-ion battery for cellular phones
GB/T 36972-2018 — Secondary lithium cells and batteries for portable applications (adopts IEC 62133-2:2017)		 The United States has no single mandatory federal safety mark for lithium batteries or power banks equivalent to the EU CE mark. However, NRTL (Nationally Recognised Testing Laboratory) listing under UL standards is the de facto market requirement enforced by retailers (Amazon, Walmart, Home Depot), Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs), and insurance underwriters. The applicable standards are: UL 1642 (Lithium Batteries — cells), UL 2054 (Household and Commercial Batteries — packs), and UL 2056 (Power Banks). Products not bearing an NRTL mark are routinely refused by US retailers, rejected at customs by CBP, or flagged under CPSC enforcement. OSHA recognises 18 NRTLs including UL, Intertek (ETL), CSA, MET, and TÜV SÜD.UL 1642 — Standard for Lithium Batteries (cells)
UL 2054 — Standard for Household and Commercial Batteries (packs)
UL 2056 — Standard for Power Banks
UL 62133-2 — Secondary lithium cells and batteries for portable applications (IEC 62133-2 equivalent, used by some NRTLs)
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.7 — NRTL recognition framework		 The core gap is the absence of a single US federal mandatory mark: unlike CE marking, no US law requires UL listing, yet market access without NRTL listing is practically impossible. Chinese GB 31241 / CCC certification does not substitute for UL 1642, UL 2054, or UL 2056 NRTL listing. Products must be independently submitted to an NRTL and tested to the relevant UL standard. Test scope differences between GB 31241-2022 and UL 2054/2056 include: cell-level abuse tests (nail penetration, crush), overcharge/overdischarge protocols, short-circuit current limits, and label/warning marking requirements. Additional gap: UL 2056 (power banks) specifically addresses reverse-charging, passthrough charging, and battery management IC failure modes not covered by GB 31241.[INFORMATIONAL] There is no single mandatory federal safety mark for lithium batteries in the US. However, NRTL listing under UL 1642 (cells), UL 2054 (packs), or UL 2056 (power banks) is the de facto requirement for US retail and AHJ acceptance. Chinese CCC/GB 31241 certification does not satisfy this requirement. Independent NRTL testing is required; Chinese test reports to GB standards are not accepted as equivalent. UL Standards & Engagement2026-06-12 · unverified
FCC Authorization — RF / Wireless Functions (Part 15, Part 18) China requires SRRC (State Radio Regulation of China) type approval for products with wireless transmission functions under the Radio Regulations of the People's Republic of China (2016). Products with Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC embedded in power banks or battery packs must obtain SRRC approval from MIIT before sale in China. Additionally, CMIIT ID (China Mobile and Internet Industry of Things network ID) is required to be marked on the product. SRRC approval is country-specific and does not transfer to the US FCC authorization scheme; separate FCC authorization is required for the US market.Radio Regulations of the People's Republic of China (2016) — SRRC type approval requirement (MIIT)
CMIIT ID marking requirement for wireless products sold in China		 Lithium battery products that incorporate any wireless or radio-frequency function — including Bluetooth (BLE) pairing for app control, NFC, Wi-Fi, or wireless charging receivers (Qi) — are electronic devices subject to FCC authorization under 47 CFR Part 15 before they may be marketed or sold in the United States. The authorization type depends on the technology: intentional radiators (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC) typically require FCC Certification (Grant of Equipment Authorization) via a Telecommunications Certification Body (TCB); unintentional radiators (switching power supplies within chargers, which can emit RF noise) require FCC Declaration of Conformity (DoC) or Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) under Part 15 Subpart B. Wireless (Qi) chargers may also require verification under Part 18 (Industrial, Scientific and Medical equipment) if their operating frequency falls within ISM bands. Pure lithium batteries with no RF-emitting circuitry do not require FCC authorization.47 CFR Part 15 — Radio Frequency Devices (FCC)
47 CFR Part 18 — Industrial, Scientific and Medical Equipment (FCC)
47 CFR Part 2 — Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations (FCC equipment authorization procedures)		 Products with wireless functions (Bluetooth app control, NFC, Wi-Fi, Qi) require separate FCC authorization for the US market — Chinese SRRC approval does not substitute. The authorization path depends on the technology: Bluetooth/Wi-Fi modules usually use FCC-certified pre-certified modules (which carry their own FCC ID), reducing the host product's authorization burden to a Class II Permissive Change or SDoC — but only if the module is used within its authorized parameters. Products using custom RF designs must obtain a new FCC Certification. A common error: treating a power bank with Bluetooth as requiring only safety listing (UL 2056) without addressing FCC Part 15 — both are required independently. Pure wired power banks with no RF emission above Part 15 thresholds are exempt from FCC certification (but not from DoC/SDoC in some cases).[INFORMATIONAL] FCC authorization under 47 CFR Part 15 is mandatory for lithium battery products with any wireless function (Bluetooth, NFC, Wi-Fi, Qi). Chinese SRRC approval does not transfer to the US. Pure wired batteries with no RF emissions above Part 15 limits do not require FCC certification. Products with pre-certified RF modules may use a reduced authorization path (SDoC), but must verify the module is used within its authorized operating conditions. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)2026-06-12 · unverified
Market Access — No Single Federal Mark; NRTL + Retailer / Amazon UL Demands China uses a mandatory CCC (China Compulsory Certification) scheme for consumer lithium battery products under GB 31241-2022. CCC is administered by CNCA (Certification and Accreditation Administration of China) and enforced by SAMR. Unlike the US layered system, CCC is a single mandatory government mark required before products may be sold in China. E-commerce platforms (Taobao, JD.com, Pinduoduo) enforce CCC for listed product categories. Chinese export products do not carry CCC on the US market — CCC is domestic-only. The contrast is significant: China has a clear mandatory mark; the US relies on a voluntary (but commercially essential) NRTL ecosystem.Regulations on Certification and Accreditation of the People's Republic of China (2021) — CCC framework
CNCA-C25-01:2024 — Compulsory certification implementation rules for lithium batteries (effective 1 March 2025)
GB 31241-2022 — Safety requirements (underlying technical standard for CCC)		 The United States does not have a single mandatory federal market-access mark for lithium batteries equivalent to the EU CE mark or China's CCC. Market access is governed by a layered system: (1) Federal safety laws — the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA, 15 U.S.C. § 2051 et seq.) empowers CPSC to require mandatory standards or issue recalls for unsafe lithium battery products; (2) De facto NRTL requirements — Amazon's Dangerous Goods Policy requires UL or equivalent NRTL listing for lithium battery products sold on its marketplace (effective for third-party sellers); major retailers (Walmart, Home Depot, Best Buy) have equivalent supplier requirements; (3) AHJ requirements — Authorities Having Jurisdiction (fire marshals, building inspectors) require NRTL listing for installed products; (4) Insurance requirements — commercial insurance underwriters require NRTL listing for product liability coverage on lithium products. The net effect is that NRTL listing (UL 2054 / UL 2056 / UL 1642) is practically mandatory for mainstream US market access even without a single federal mandate.Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. § 2051 et seq. — CPSC enforcement authority
CPSC Recall authority under 15 U.S.C. § 2064 — mandatory recall powers for substantial product hazards
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.7 — NRTL recognition program (18 recognised NRTLs including UL, Intertek/ETL, CSA, MET, TÜV SÜD)
Amazon Dangerous Goods Policy — UL or equivalent NRTL listing requirement for lithium battery products (de facto market requirement for e-commerce)		 The absence of a single US federal mark creates a compliance mapping challenge for Chinese exporters accustomed to the CCC model. The US market requires: (1) NRTL listing (UL 2054/2056/1642) — obtained via independent NRTL test submission, not via Chinese certification bodies; (2) CPSC compliance — no mandatory filing is required for most lithium battery products, but manufacturers must maintain a Children's Product Certificate or General Certificate of Conformity where applicable, and must report substantial product hazards under Section 15(b) of CPSA; (3) Amazon/retailer compliance — NRTL documentation must be submitted to retailer portals and kept current; (4) Customs — CBP may detain shipments based on CPSC alerts; detention releases require NRTL documentation. Chinese sellers commonly fail Amazon's dangerous goods listing process by submitting GB/CCC certificates rather than NRTL documentation.[INFORMATIONAL] There is no single US federal mandatory mark for lithium batteries. However, NRTL listing (UL 2054/2056/1642) is the de facto commercial gate enforced by Amazon, major retailers, AHJs, and insurers. Chinese CCC certification does not transfer to the US market. CPSC retains recall and mandatory standard authority under CPSA. Exporters must obtain independent NRTL listing and maintain CPSC compliance documentation. US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)2026-06-12 · unverified
State / Special Rules — California (CARB / Cal Fire), NYC Local Law 39, Lithium Shipping Restrictions China does not have an equivalent sub-national patchwork of state-level lithium battery rules in the same sense. However, China has national-level regulations for specific applications: the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) and the Ministry of Emergency Management regulate lithium battery safety for specific applications (e-bikes under GB 17761-2018, e-scooters, energy storage under GB/T 36276-2023). Chinese manufacturers are not typically exposed to sub-national compliance variation within China in the same way as the US market. There is no equivalent to NYC Local Law 39 in China — China's approach is national CCC-based.GB 17761-2018 — Safety requirements for electric bicycles (China, MIIT/SAMR)
GB/T 36276-2023 — Lithium-ion battery for electric energy storage (China, SAC)		 Several US states and localities impose requirements beyond federal law on lithium batteries, particularly for e-mobility applications (e-bikes, e-scooters, electric unicycles) and large-format energy storage. Key requirements: (1) California — Cal Fire and the California Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) enforce UL listing requirements for lithium battery products in certain applications; the California Energy Commission (CEC) has additional requirements for battery energy storage systems; (2) New York City — Local Law 39 of 2023 (effective 6 September 2023) prohibits the sale of non-UL-listed lithium-ion batteries, chargers, and battery packs used with e-mobility devices (e-bikes, e-scooters, self-balancing scooters); Local Law 39 is enforced by FDNY and NYC DSS; (3) IATA/ICAO post-2018 — following the FAA Reauthorization Act 2018, bulk lithium battery shipments on passenger aircraft face additional restrictions (quantity limits, state-of-charge caps); some airlines refuse lithium battery cargo entirely on passenger flights; (4) Lithium battery disposal — many states follow EPA guidelines or impose state recycling obligations (e.g., California's SB 1215, battery stewardship programs). NOTE: NYC Local Law 39 is a significant enforcement priority — FDNY has issued hundreds of violations and seized non-compliant e-bike batteries.NYC Local Law 39 of 2023 — Prohibition on sale of non-UL-listed lithium-ion batteries for e-mobility devices (effective 6 September 2023)
California SB 1215 (2022) — Rechargeable battery stewardship program (Cal Recycle)
FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-254) — Section 335, lithium battery cargo restrictions on passenger aircraft
49 CFR Part 175 — Carriage by Aircraft (DOT/FAA implementation of lithium battery air transport restrictions)		 US state and local rules create a compliance patchwork that is not present in China's centralised regulatory model. Key gaps for Chinese exporters: (1) NYC Local Law 39 — e-mobility battery products without UL 2271 (e-bike battery packs) or UL 2272 (personal e-mobility) listing cannot legally be sold in NYC; this applies to online sales shipped to NYC addresses; (2) California — products for California must meet any OSFM or CEC requirements specific to application type; (3) Air shipping — products shipped by air must comply with current IATA DGR edition restrictions, including per-package watt-hour limits and quantity caps; post-2018 FAA rules tightened cargo limits further; (4) Disposal — exporters shipping into California must comply with SB 1215 battery stewardship requirements or partner with a compliant stewardship programme. The overall gap: China's single CCC national framework does not prepare exporters for the US's distributed, multi-authority compliance landscape.[INFORMATIONAL] US state and local rules create compliance obligations beyond federal requirements. NYC Local Law 39 (2023) bans non-UL-listed e-mobility batteries in New York City — this is actively enforced with fines and seizures. California imposes application-specific requirements via OSFM/CEC. Air shipment restrictions under 49 CFR Part 175 / IATA DGR apply nationally. Chinese exporters accustomed to a single national CCC framework should account for this distributed US compliance landscape. New York City Fire Department (FDNY)2026-06-12 · unverified
Transport Safety — UN 38.3 + DOT 49 CFR 173.185 (PHMSA) China requires UN 38.3 test reports for all lithium battery exports — the test protocol is internationally harmonised. For domestic transport, China follows GB/T 28278 (Packaging for transportation of lithium batteries) and the CAAC Dangerous Goods Air Transport Regulations for air cargo. China Customs requires a UN 38.3 test summary for lithium battery exports from April 2023 under GACC Order 248/Order 249 requirements. The UN 38.3 report from a Chinese accredited laboratory (e.g., CBTL, CTI, SGS China) is directly usable for US import documentation purposes, as UN 38.3 is internationally standardised — this is one area where Chinese test reports ARE recognised.UN 38.3 test report (internationally harmonised — Chinese accredited lab reports accepted for US DOT/IATA purposes)
GB/T 28278-2012 — Packaging for transportation of lithium batteries
CAAC Provisions on the Air Transportation of Dangerous Goods (民航危险品运输管理规定)		 All lithium batteries and cells shipped to or within the United States — whether by air (IATA/ICAO), ocean (IMDG), or ground (DOT) — must comply with the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Section 38.3 (UN 38.3), the international test protocol for lithium battery transport safety. For US domestic and import shipments by ground or vessel, the primary federal regulation is 49 CFR Part 173.185 (Hazardous Materials Regulations, PHMSA/DOT), which incorporates UN 38.3 test requirements by reference and specifies packaging, labelling (Class 9 hazard label, lithium battery mark), state-of-charge limits (≤30% for standalone cells/batteries shipped separately from equipment), and documentation requirements (shipper's declaration). Air shipments follow IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR) Packing Instructions PI 965–970, which implement ICAO Technical Instructions. The FAA Reauthorization Act 2018 imposed additional restrictions on bulk lithium battery cargo on passenger aircraft.49 CFR Part 173.185 — Lithium cells and batteries (DOT/PHMSA Hazardous Materials Regulations)
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Section 38.3 (UN 38.3) — 7th revised edition
IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR), Packing Instructions PI 965–970 (current edition)
ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
IMDG Code (for ocean freight) — lithium battery provisions (Class 9)		 The key gap is the US-specific packaging and documentation requirements under 49 CFR 173.185 — these go beyond UN 38.3 testing. US exporters and importers must ensure: (1) inner/outer packaging meets 49 CFR specifications (e.g., strong outer packaging, cushioning, cell separation); (2) state-of-charge (SOC) is ≤30% for standalone cells/batteries shipped separately from equipment (this is a common customs detention trigger); (3) Class 9 hazard label and lithium battery handling mark affixed to outer packaging; (4) shipper's declaration completed correctly. Air shipments require IATA DGR compliance per the current edition's packing instructions (PI 965–970) — these are updated annually and the applicable edition year matters. Chinese exporters commonly use UN 38.3 reports from the previous edition — verify the edition year is current.[INFORMATIONAL] UN 38.3 testing is internationally harmonised and Chinese lab reports are accepted for US transport documentation — this is one area where Chinese certification directly transfers. However, US-specific 49 CFR 173.185 packaging, labelling (Class 9 + lithium battery mark), state-of-charge limits (≤30% standalone), and shipper's declaration requirements must be met independently. IATA DGR (current edition) applies for air. Failure to comply triggers CBP detention and PHMSA penalties. PHMSA / US Department of Transportation2026-06-12 · unverified

E-E-A-T

Named editorial review

Pending named reviewer

Official regulator, standards body, notified body, customs, or primary legal source preferred. Local PDFs are not accepted.

Editorial controls

Rows must include publisher, official URL, access date, verification flag, and last_verified before human_reviewed can be true.

SOURCES

Official-source register.